Reason 1: 50% wage base interaction with the threshold
If an employee’s monthly gross is ₹42,000, then 50% wage base could be ₹21,000 and may align with the ESI threshold. Under the old approach, eligibility was typically assessed on gross wages, and such an employee would generally fall outside the threshold.
Reason 2: More employees inside the net at lower relative medical cost
With the eligibility lens moving towards a structured wage definition (Part A/B/C), the net may capture more employees who were earlier outside coverage, enabling access to ESI medical protections that can be more cost-effective than private healthcare.
Reason 3: Standardised wage definition and wider worker categories
The standardised wage definition is expected to influence inclusion of wider categories of workers, including gig, platform and unorganised sector workers, and similar implications may extend to provident fund schemes as well.
Reason 4: Mid-level and lower-level employees may see automatic coverage
Many mid-level and lower-level employees who were outside ESI coverage earlier due to gross wages above ₹21,000 may find coverage triggered under the new wage lens.
Reason 5: Employer compliance and processing obligations increase
This could increase employer compliance obligations and processing workload, with financial implications. For employees, it expands medical and social protection availability.
Reason 6: Government empowerment to expand sector coverage
The codes enable Government to include more industries from time to time, which is viewed as a notable development in recent decades.
Share This News